Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908

Reilly v. McKeefrey

Reilly v. McKeefrey
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 5, 1908
108 N.Y.S. 1011 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James E. Smith, for appellant., Purdy, Squire & Rowe, for respondent.

Reilly v. McKeefrey

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This court will not disturb the determination of facts arrived at- by the learned trial justice in this case, a hors' case—a determination resting upon conflicting testimony given by the seller and the buyer and their respective experts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., and MacLEAN, J., concur. BISCHOFF; J., concurs in the result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.