Ahnert v. Union Railway Co.
Ahnert v. Union Railway Co.
110 N.Y.S. 376
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The opinion testimony asked of plaintiff’s witness, to which defendant objected, would ordinarily have been inadmissible; but defendant’s cross-examination of the plaintiff along the same lines over plaintiff’s objection opened the door to otherwise incompetent proof. Van Ingen v. Mail & Express Pub. Co., 156 N. Y. 376, 388, 50 N. E. 979.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.