Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908

Cronin v. Bienenzucht

Cronin v. Bienenzucht
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 16, 1908 · Hendrick
113 N.Y.S. 546 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Wait & Foster, for appellants., Rose & Putzel, for respondents.

Cronin v. Bienenzucht

Opinion of the Court

HENDRICK, J.

Appeal from an order setting aside a verdict of the jury as against the weight of evidence. The rule is that, on appeals from orders granting or refusing new trials upon a claim that the verdict is against the evidence, the decision of the trial judge is of the weightiest influence, Aldridge v. Aldridge, 120 N. Y. 614—617, 24 N. E. 1022. The record not only shows no abuse of the discretion which is reposed in the trial justice, but amply sustains the order set- ' ting aside the verdict.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.