Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908

Korenman v. Blauner

Korenman v. Blauner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 16, 1908
113 N.Y.S. 736 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Wilkenfeld & Bitterman (Joseph Wilkenfeld, of counsel), for appellants., Henry Kuntz, for respondents.

Korenman v. Blauner

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Even if the papers showed a meritorious defense, which they do not, the motion to open the default was properly denied because of the defendants’ inexcusable and unexplained conduct in answering the case “Ready” day after day, and holding the plaintiff and his witnesses in court, during all of which time the defendants had, or should have had, knowlédge of the absence of the witness who they now claim was necessary to their defense.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.