Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Reitzfeld v. Sobel

Reitzfeld v. Sobel
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 8, 1909
114 N.Y.S. 27 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Otto F. Seggel, for appellants., Samuel Manheimer, for respondent.

Reitzfeld v. Sobel

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The testimony given on the part of the plaintiff failed to show that she was hired for any definite period, and, as her right to recover for one month’s wages depended upon such proof, the judgment must be reversed. Frank v. Man. Mat. & Dis. (Sup.) 107 N. Y. Supp. 404.

Judgment reversed and new trial.ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.