Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Smith v. Geoghegan

Smith v. Geoghegan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 8, 1909
114 N.Y.S. 29 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James F. Higgins, for appellant., Edward A. McShane, for respondent.

Smith v. Geoghegan

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

At the time when the plaintiff paid the deposit of $100 to the defendant, there was certainly-no meeting of the minds of the parties upon a lease, since the lessor’s consent was concededly withheld, and the evidence justified the trial court in reaching the conclusion that this deposit was of a tentative character, and was made with the understanding that the plaintiff could withdraw it in three days, if he then determined not to take a lease. The case is within the rule applied in Aquelini v. Provident Realty Co. (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 1014.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.