Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

New York Cornice & Skylight Works v. Zipkin

New York Cornice & Skylight Works v. Zipkin
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 8, 1909
114 N.Y.S. 58 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Nathan Friedman, for appellant., Arnstein & Levy, for respondent.

New York Cornice & Skylight Works v. Zipkin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff claims $300 balance due for work, materials, etc., furnished under a written contract. Defendant counterclaims $285 for the failure of plaintiff to perform the work according to contract. The court found in favor of defendant, and allowed defendant the full amount of the counterclaim (i. e., $285), for which sum, with costs, judgment was given for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Inasmuch as the evidence, taken in the view most favorable to defendant, shows that plaintiff is entitled to $300, less the defendant’s counterclaim of $285, the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for $15. While the appellate court has the power to modify the judgment, still, under the circumstances presented, we think a new trial should be granted.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.