Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Frankel v. Central Railroad of New Jersey

Frankel v. Central Railroad of New Jersey
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 8, 1909 · Bischoff
114 N.Y.S. 137 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

De Forest Bros., for appellant., Emerich Kohn, for respondent.

Frankel v. Central Railroad of New Jersey

Opinion of the Court

BISCHOFF, J.

The plaintiff’s recovery, upon the basis of an agreement whereby his assignor was employed by the month, is not supported by the record, and the judgment must be reversed. So far as appears, the only proof of the terms of the contract disclosed a .hiring “at $70 a month,” and it is the settled rule in this jurisdiction that such an agreement, in the absence of words to define the period of employment, is not a hiring for a month, but is terminable at will. Martin v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co., 148 N. Y. 117, 131, 43 N. E. 416.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.