Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Zeller v. Greenebaum

Zeller v. Greenebaum
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 7, 1909
116 N.Y.S. 556 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Abraham Kutz, for appellant., Myron Sulzberger, for respondent.

Zeller v. Greenebaum

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, employed as a butcher, sued to recover $13 for one week’s wages. The services were not denied. Defendant claimed that he had discharged plaintiff because he had been told by his cashier that plaintiff had been taking tips from customers and giving away his employer’s goods and that plaintiff had admitted these things. This the plaintiff denied. The trial judge found for defendant.

If the defendant had proved that plaintiff had disposed of goods’ ■equal in amount to the latter’s salary, defendant might have been allowed to offset the value of those goods. This, however, the defendant did not do; the only evidence offered on this head being in regard to one small purchase, amounting to 33 cents, which plaintiff swears was paid for.

The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.