Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Kaplan v. Wallis

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 27, 1909 · Lehman

117 N.Y.S. 1138 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Heyn & Covington (Bernard G. Heyn, of counsel), for appellant., Herman Roth, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, J.

The affidavit for the bill of particulars is so defective that it is insufficient to “set the court in motion.” Wales Mfg. Co. v. Lazzaro, 19 Misc. Rep. 477, 43 N. Y. Supp. 1110. The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.