Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Marcus v. Joline

Marcus v. Joline
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 12, 1909
119 N.Y.S. 172 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Anthony J. Ernest, for appellant., Fannie Horovitz, for respondents.

Marcus v. Joline

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought an action, based upon the alleged negligence of the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant offered no evidence, but made this motion: “I make the usual motion, if the court pleases.” Thereupon the court said: “Judgment for the defendant. The complaint is dismissed upon the *173merits.” Upon this appeal, both sides concede that a dismissal upon the merits was error.

Judgment modified, by inserting a direction that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice to a new action, and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to the appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.