Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Wolf v. People's Surety Co.

Wolf v. People's Surety Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 22, 1909
119 N.Y.S. 1078 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Edward M. Grout and Paul Grout, for appellant., Sidney Rossman, for respondent.

Wolf v. People's Surety Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is evidence that plaintiff gave defendant' notice of the pendency of his action against Woods, to recover damages for negligent blasting, against which both Woods and defendant had given their joint bond of indemnity, running to the city of New York. There is also evidence that the notice was given four days before trial of plaintiff’s action against Woods. This court cannot say that the notice was unreasonably short, in view of the facility with which adjournments may be had in the Municipal Court, in which that-action was tried, but must follow the ruling of the trial judge.

As to the question of defendant’s liability, in any event, upon the bond in suit, this court is bound by the decision of the Appellate Division in this department in Obendorfer v. City of New York, 130 App. Div. 877, 114 N. Y. Supp. 1139.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.