Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Holly v. Healy

Holly v. Healy
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 12, 1909
119 N.Y.S. 1129 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frederick W. Block, for appellant., James C. Brady, for respondent.

Holly v. Healy

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The answer of the defendant, attempting to plead the statute of limitations, is fatally defective, in that it fails to allege that six years had elapsed prior to the commencement of the action and since the cause of action accrued. It was not, therefore, available to the defendant as a defense, and the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint was error. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.