Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Drum v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.

Drum v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1910
66 Misc. 143; 121 N.Y.S. 332

Counsel

Raymond David Fuller, for appellant. „, Charles L. Hoffman, 'for respondent.

Drum v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The policy contains a provision that “ Mo action shall lie against the Company as respects any loss or *144expense under this Policy, unless it shall he brought by the Assured himself.” This was probably inserted in order to prevent assignments of doubtful claims to irresponsible parties for purposes of suit. Whatever its object, it binds the parties. Hence this suit, being by an assignee, must fail.

Present: Seabury, Guy and Whitney, JJ.

■Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.