Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Becker v. New York Taxicab Co.

Becker v. New York Taxicab Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 21, 1910 · Dayton
120 N.Y.S. 763 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Isidor Cohn, for appellant., Lewis D. Mooney, for respondent.

Becker v. New York Taxicab Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Dissenting Opinion

DAYTON, J.

(dissenting). Plaintiff’s testimony was corroborated by a police officer. Defendant’s chauffeur, an interested witness, gave *764the only testimony for defendant. His evidence is far from convincing. Plaintiff sustained the burden of proof.

The judgment for defendant was error, and should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.