Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Gottlieb v. Fine

Gottlieb v. Fine
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 18, 1910
121 N.Y.S. 236 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Ely Rosenberg, for appellant., Herman Gottlieb, for respondent.

Gottlieb v. Fine

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The stenographer’s minutes in this case are lost, and the appeal comes before the court upon affidavits, pursuant to section 319 of the Municipal Court act. The affidavits disclose that there was a sharp conflict of testimony upon material facts in the court below. This method of disposing of such a case.upon appeal is unsatisfactory, and we think the interests of justice will be best subserved by ordering a new trial.' Kirsch v. Halbach (December App. Term, not, yet officially reported) 120 N. Y. Supp. 740.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, without costs to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.