Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Eilert v. Gordon

Eilert v. Gordon
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 10, 1910
121 N.Y.S. 604 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Isaac N. Miller, for appellant., Meisel & Bolles, for respondent.

Eilert v. Gordon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff is the publisher of the Luther League Review. Defendant advertised therein. The contract was in the form of written authority, on a printed blank addressed to “the publishers of the Luther League Review,” accepted by printing the advertisement. The Review is owned by the "Luther League, an unincorporated re*605ligious association said to have 80,000 members. We think that plaintiff was authorized to sue under Code Civ. Proc. § 449; Considerant v. Brisbane, 22 N. Y. 389, 395; Albany & Rensselaer Co. v. Lundberg, 121 U. S. 451, 453, 7 Sup. Ct. 958, 30 L. Ed. 982.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.