Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Kyle v. Horbert

Kyle v. Horbert
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 8, 1910
122 N.Y.S. 204 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Maurice B. & Daniel W. Blumenthal, for appellant., Campbell & Moore, for respondents.

Kyle v. Horbert

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover commissions for procuring a purchaser ready, willing, and able to buy certain real property at the request of the defendant. The evidence establishes that the defendant was acting as agent for a disclosed principal. The principal, and not the agent, is therefore liable for the commissions ■alleged to have been earned.

Judgment reversed, and a new-trial ordered,'with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.