Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Mergentine v. Arverne Hotel Supply Co.

Mergentine v. Arverne Hotel Supply Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1910 · Seabury
123 N.Y.S. 52 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Herman B. Goodstein, for appellant., Cromwell G. Macy, for respondent.

Mergentine v. Arverne Hotel Supply Co.

Opinion of the Court

SEABURY, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover the value of vegetables alleged to have been sold to- the defendant, the Arverne Hotel Supply Company, and has recovered a judgment in his favor.

The evidence established that the plaintiff sold the vegetables to Mr. Kaufman. There was no proof that Kaufman was the agent of the defendant, or that the vegetables were delivered to the defendant. The judgment is clearly without any support in the evidence.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.