Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Herz v. Illinois Surety Co.

Herz v. Illinois Surety Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 24, 1910
123 N.Y.S. 808 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frederick L. C. Keating, for appellant., Wray & Callaghan, for respondent.

Herz v. Illinois Surety Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This judgment purports to have been rendered upon an agreed statement of facts submitted to the lower court. The only provision for the submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts in the Municipal Court is contained in section 241 of the Municipal Court act (Acts 1902, c. 580). That section requires that such statement must be accompanied with the affidavit of one or more of the parties thereto to the effect that the controversy is real and the submission made in good faith, for the purpose of determining the rights of the parties; and this court has held that without such an affidavit the court below has no jurisdiction to render a judgment. Neustaedter v. Weiner, 57 Misc. Rep. 643, 108 N. Y. Supp. *809650; Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627, 97 N. Y. Supp. 396.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.