Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

M. P. Smith & Sons Co. v. B. Koronsky & Son

M. P. Smith & Sons Co. v. B. Koronsky & Son
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 24, 1910 · Seabury
123 N.Y.S. 950 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Horace London, for appellant., McFarland, Taylor & Costello, for respondent.

M. P. Smith & Sons Co. v. B. Koronsky & Son

Opinion of the Court

SEABURY, J.

This appeal is taken under section 311 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580), upon the ground that the defendant was not served with a summons. The plaintiff claims that service was made upon one Louis Silverman, managing agent of the defendant corporation. The weakness of the plaintiff’s position is that there is no competent proof presented to show that Silverman was the managing agent of the defendant.

The judgment is reversed, and the complaint is dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.