Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Lubelsky v. Haimowitz

Lubelsky v. Haimowitz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 24, 1910 · Bijur
123 N.Y.S. 974 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frank & Wolfson, for appellant., Weinberg Brothers, for respondents:

Lubelsky v. Haimowitz

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.

The plaintiffs, landlords, sued for rent due under a lease. The defendant counterclaimed for breach of a covenant to *975repair. The repairs claimed were to ovens and chimneys connected with the basement of the premises. The lease describes the premises rented as β€œthe basement bakery.” I think that the judge below erred in holding that the ovens and chimneys were not part of the premises so described.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.