Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Dantone v. Rodgers & Haggerty, Inc.

Dantone v. Rodgers & Haggerty, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 11, 1910 · Seabury
125 N.Y.S. 481 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James B. Henney, for appellant., Charles M. Kiefer, for respondent.

Dantone v. Rodgers & Haggerty, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

SEABURY, J.

This is a common-law action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant’s negligence. The proof is unsatisfactory and meager. The plaintiff proved that, while he was in defendant’s employ, working on a ditch in Canal street, some dirt and stones fell on him, causing the injuries complained of. There was no evidence to show what caused the dirt and stones to fall, or that the defendant’s failure to exercise due care was in any way responsible for the accident.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.