Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Roos v. Treubig

Roos v. Treubig
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1910
125 N.Y.S. 782 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Vitale & Vitale, for appellant., Nathaniel Phillips, for respondent.

Roos v. Treubig

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The testimony given upon the examination of the judgment debtor is insufficient to warrant the imposition of a fine of more than $250, that being the maximum fine which can be imposed as a punishment for contempt where no actual loss or injury is shown. Ross v. La. Cagnina, 124 N. Y. Supp. 753.

The order appealed from is modified, by reducing the fine imposed to the sum of $250 and $30 costs, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements of this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.