Roos v. Treubig
Roos v. Treubig
125 N.Y.S. 782
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The testimony given upon the examination of the judgment debtor is insufficient to warrant the imposition of a fine of more than $250, that being the maximum fine which can be imposed as a punishment for contempt where no actual loss or injury is shown. Ross v. La. Cagnina, 124 N. Y. Supp. 753.
The order appealed from is modified, by reducing the fine imposed to the sum of $250 and $30 costs, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements of this appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.