Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Scheinholtz v. Platt

Scheinholtz v. Platt
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 9, 1911
127 N.Y.S. 313 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

O’Brien, Boardman, Platt & Littleton (Branch P. Kerfoot, of counsel), for appellant., Dennis F. O’Brien (Robert C. Moore, of counsel), for respondent.

Scheinholtz v. Platt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This case comes before this court upon an agreed statement of facts, signed by the attorneys for the respective parties herein. This statement, however, is not accompanied by an affidavit, made by one of the parties, in compliance with section 241 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580), and the court was therefore without jurisdiction to render a judgment. Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627, 97 N. Y. Supp. 396; Pollock v. Platt, 49 Misc. Rep. 635, 97 N. Y. Supp. 990; Herz v. Illinois Surety Co., 123 N. Y. Supp. 808.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.