Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Goldstein v. Perlman

Goldstein v. Perlman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1911 · Bijur
128 N.Y.S. 21 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Abraham Brill, for appellant., Israel M. Lerner, for respondent.

Goldstein v. Perlman

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sued for $248.25. After partial proof, he discontinued. Twenty dollars costs were awarded to defendant under section 332, subd. 2, of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580). The costs should have been awarded under subdivision 6. See Blum v. O’Connor (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 207; Whitman Co. v. Travers Bailey Co. (Sup.) 96 N. Y. Supp. 172.

Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the amount of $10 costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.