Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Federal Varnish Co. v. Boelsen

Federal Varnish Co. v. Boelsen
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 8, 1911
128 N.Y.S. 658 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James I. Moore, for appellant Boelsen., Gallatin & Lebowitz, for appellant Fass., William H. Keeler (John H. McCrahon, of counsel), for respondent.

Federal Varnish Co. v. Boelsen

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial justice did not dismiss the counterclaims, but gave judgment after both parties had rested. Though the testimony produced by. the defendants was not contradicted, it was given by witnesses directly interested in the result or having a confessed bias, and was subject to the court’s scrutiny. It was improbable *659in many particulars, and the witness ICiernan and the defendant Fass fail to agree in their testimony as to the representations made by Kiernan. It does not appear that the trial justice credited these witnesses, and the judgments should be affirmed, with costs.

Judgments affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.