Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Cahill v. Torrey

Cahill v. Torrey
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 8, 1911
128 N.Y.S. 1116 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Alva Collins, for appellant., Harry Cook (Nathan April, of counsel), for respondents.

Cahill v. Torrey

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is no competent evidence to show that the defendants have paid: the gas bills for the premises occupied by the corporation at 3 East Fourteenth street and at 391 Broadway. The defendants have apparently not made any claim, either in their answer or at the trial, that they are entitled to any rebate for gas used at these premises. The findings that the defendants are entitled to these rebates, amounting to $12S¡74, must therefore *1117be reversed, and the judgment modified, by providing that the defendants are_ entitled to rebates amounting to $802.41, with interest, and the plaintiff to rebates amounting to_ $128.74, with interest, and that the chamberlain of the city of New York shall pay to the parties pro rata the fund of $926.39, together with accrued interest thereon, less his fees for paying out said moneys, and by striking out the provision for costs, and. as modified, affirmed, without costs on this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.