Schaffer v. J. Lesowitz & Co.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff heretofore commenced her action against the defendant, and in that action obtained a warrant of attachment. The summons was not served upon any officer of the defendant. The person upon whom service was made was one David Adler, who was not an officer, employé, agent, stockholder, or director of the defendant. On the return day the defendant appeared specially and traversed the return. The court below dismissed the traverse, and the case was set down for December 12, 1910 for trial. On that day the plaintiff took an inquest and obtained a judgment against defendant for $186.29. The defendant thereupon appealed from the order denying a motion to vacate the warrant, made on the ground that the papers upon which it was granted were deficient, and also appealed from the judgment entered against it, on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to allow the same, inasmuch as the defendant was never served with process.
These two appeals were heard at the February term, 1911, of the Appellate Term. The order denying the motion to vacate the war
The return of the marshal shows that one David Adler is the only person who was served, and, as he had nothing to do with the corporation defendant, the judgment taken against the defendant is void, and should be vacated, with costs.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.