Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Goodman Contracting Co. v. Baltimore Bridge Co.

Goodman Contracting Co. v. Baltimore Bridge Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 4, 1911 · Lehman
129 N.Y.S. 1124 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Wait & Foster (William L. Bowman, of counsel), for appellant. Foley, Martin & Nelson, for respondent.

Goodman Contracting Co. v. Baltimore Bridge Co.

Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment for $265.04, exclusive of costs, in an action for services rendered to defendant at its special instance and request. The record is voluminous and complicated, owing to the large number of items contained in plaintiff’s bill of particulars. A careful examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error of law, and I do not find that the judgment is against the weight of evidence. The trial justice, however, erroneously awarded judgment for the amount demanded, which is larger than the amqunt of the items claimed in the bill of particulars or shown at the trial. The judgment should be reduced to $237.04, the amount actually proven, with appropriate costs, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of the appeal to either party. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.