Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Stoughton v. Chu Fong

Stoughton v. Chu Fong
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 29, 1911 · Bijur
130 N.Y.S. 228 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Simon Sultan, for appellant., John T. Canavan, for respondent.

Stoughton v. Chu Fong

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.

This action is brought to recover upon certain promissory notes. The defense is, in substance, that the notes were given upon the understanding that they were to have no validity whatsoever until a certain institution was established, and that no such institution was ever established. The answer, therefore, pleads a condition precedent to the validity of the notes, and as such pleads a complete provable defense. Smith v. Dotterweich, 200 N. Y. 299, 93 N. E. 985, and cases therein cited.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.