Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Simpson Crawford Co. v. Knight

Simpson Crawford Co. v. Knight
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 29, 1911 · Seabury
130 N.Y.S. 236 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Irving C. Fox, for appellant., C. Bertram Plante, for respondent.

Simpson Crawford Co. v. Knight

Opinion of the Court

SEABURY, J.

This is an action to foreclose a lien upon a chattel. The plaintiff sold a piano to the defendant under a .conditional sale agreement, and proved that $70.42 was due and unpaid under the contract. The plaintiff also proved that it made repairs upon the-piano, at the defendant’s request, of the value of $50. No claim for this sum is made in the complaint. The plaintiff had no lien upon the-chattel for the amount of this last item. The court erred in awarding the plaintiff a judgment for an amount including the $50 item and directing that the chattel be sold to satisfy the amount of the plaintiff’s claim.

The judgment is modified, by reducing the same to the sum of $70.42, with appropriate costs in the court below, and, as modified,, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.