Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Nelson Co. v. J. & W. Cahill & Co.

Nelson Co. v. J. & W. Cahill & Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 16, 1911
131 N.Y.S. 576 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Joseph Fennelly, for appellant., J. A. Seidman, for respondent.

Nelson Co. v. J. & W. Cahill & Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is too broad in its scope. It should be modified, by limiting the examination of the defendant solely to the matters set forth in the complaint, which are denied by the answer, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with disbursements to the appellant.

Order modified, by striking therefrom the words β€œand relative to the issues- in this action,” and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, but *577with disbursements to the appellant, with permission to the plaintiff, to apply to the lower court to fix a date for the hearing and to provide for service in accordance with sections 873, 874, and 875 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.