Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Stein v. Hirschhorn

Stein v. Hirschhorn
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 10, 1911
131 N.Y.S. 1145 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

I. Gainsburg, for appellant., Maurice Neekritz, for respondent.

Stein v. Hirschhorn

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case discloses that the lower court has misconceived the issue presented and that there is no legal basis for the judgment rendered. Under the facts proved, if the plaintiff was entitled to anything, it would seem that he was entitled to the full amount claimed. A review of the record convinces us that substantial justice to both parties requires a new trial. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.