Cushier v. Adams
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff leased the top floor of her private house to the defendant' for use as a “ private dwelling apartment.” The lease is silent as. to any supply of hot water, but, inasmuch as the fixtures were connected with the general hot water system of the house which was heated from the kitchen in the basement and was under the plaintiff’s control, a covenaiit to supply hot water might reasonably be implied. That covenant, however, would be to supply only such hot water as would reasonably be expected under the
• circumstances, viz., such supply as would be furnished ordinarily in a small private house. It would certainly be unreasonable to expect the landlord of a single leased apartment situated in his private house to keep a supply of hot water at all hours day and night, for the convenience of his single tenant. The defendant leased the apartment for one year from the first day of October and vacated the apartment on
Guy and Bijur, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.