Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Giampaola v. Paoli

Giampaola v. Paoli
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 8, 1912
133 N.Y.S. 460 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Ralph W. Botham, for appellant., Charles S. Rosenthal, for respondent.

Giampaola v. Paoli

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The evidence contained in the record before us upon this appeal does not materially differ from that given upon a' former trial of this case, which resulted in a judgment which was reversed. 129 N. Y. Supp. 180. It follows, therefore, that a reversal must again be ordered.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.