Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Harper Machinery Co. v. Donegan

Harper Machinery Co. v. Donegan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 17, 1912 · Seabury
134 N.Y.S. 888 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Joseph Sapinsky, of New York City (Alvin T. Sapinslty, of counsel), for appellant., ' Williams, Folsom & Strouse, of New York City (Charles MacEaren, of counsel), for respondent. •

Harper Machinery Co. v. Donegan

Opinion of the Court

SEABURY, J.

The complaint alleges a cause of action for the alleged breach of an express warranty. The answer was a general denial. The answer was amended upon the trial, but the amendment did not demand affirmative relief from the plaintiff in this action. Upon the close of the testimony the plaintiff made a motion to discontinue this action. Thereafter the learned court below rendered judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff for $432.13. The plaintiff had a right voluntarily to discontinue the action before it wa's finally submitted. Nichols v. Williams, 42 Misc. Rep. 527, 86 N. Y. Supp. 136.

The judgment is reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the complaint is dismissed, with costs of the action to the respondent, without prejudice to a new action. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.