Sherman v. Oelsner
Sherman v. Oelsner
135 N.Y.S. 592
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The summons in this action was never personally served upon either of these defendants, and they never appeared in the lower court in a manner sufficient to confer jurisdiction over the person. The service of the summons upon one Walter, as the agent of a copartnership, is unauthorized, and the defendants were not bound by such service.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.