Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Dick v. Leonori

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 13, 1912 · Bijur

135 N.Y.S. 1045 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Forster, Hotaling & Klenke, of New York City,, for appellant., Philip Carpenter, of New York City, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.

Under the circumstances disclosed by the record in this case, full costs to date, together with $10 costs of the motion, should have been imposed. Purcell v. Hoffman House, 131 App. Div. 239, 115 N. Y. Supp. 778; Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co., 115 App. Div. 172, 100 N. Y. Supp. 681; Dunham v. Hastings Co., 109 App. Div. 514, 96 N. Y. Supp. 313.

The order appealed from is modified, by imposing full costs, together with $10 motion costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.