Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Driscoll

Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Driscoll
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 8, 1912
137 N.Y.S. 871 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles Harwood, of New York City, for appellant., Wilber, Norman & Kahn, of New York City, .for respondent.

Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Driscoll

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There are two appeals in this case—one from the judgment taken against the defendant, and one from an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment upon the ground of fraud, etc.

The order appealed from recites that “upon the minutes in the above-entitled action, * * * and upon the minutes in the case of Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Lionel Realty Co.,” etc., the motion is denied. The minutes taken in the last-named action have not been handed up with the return herein, and it is evident that the appeal from the order cannot be determined until such minutes are made a part of the return.

The return is therefore remitted to the lower court for amendment in that respect.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.