Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Goodstein v. Feinberg

Goodstein v. Feinberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 8, 1912
137 N.Y.S. 875 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Barnett & Jablow, of New York City, for appellant., Mortimer W. Solomon, of New York City, for respondent.

Goodstein v. Feinberg

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal taken by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant.

[1] The notice of appeal states that the appeal will bring up for review an order made by a justice of the Municipal Court, before whom the case was once tried, setting aside a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and ordering a new trial. No appeal was taken from that order, and the plaintiff appeared upon the day fixed for a néw trial and proceeded therewith without objection. He is thereby precluded from now contesting the validity of- that order, which could only be done upon appeal therefrom.

[2] Upon the merits of this appeal there was nothing but a question of fact, with conflicting evidence, and the judgment, not appearing to be against the weight of evidence, should not be disturbed.

Judgment affifmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.