Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Gordon v. Boondas

Gordon v. Boondas
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 6, 1912
138 N.Y.S. 1117 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. Nathan Helfat, of New York City, for appellant., Elias Rosenthal, of New York City, for respondent.

Gordon v. Boondas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, upon authority of Weis v. Levy, 106 App. Div. 496, 500, 94 N Y. Supp. 857; Curtis v. Douglass (City Ct. N. Y.) 130 N. Y. Supp. 1054, and Sheridan v. Mayor, etc., 68 N. Y. 30.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.