Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Lickerman v. Motchan

Lickerman v. Motchan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 15, 1913 · Bijtjb, Seabury
82 Misc. 405; 143 N.Y.S. 731

Counsel

Edward J. Walsh, for appellant., Henry Knntz (Abraham P. Wilkes, of counsel), for respondent.

Lickerman v. Motchan

Opinion of the Court

Seabury, J.

The complaint states a cause of action, and demands judgment for $5,000. The defendant demurred “ on the ground that the jurisdiction of the court is limited to actions where the sum claimed does not exceed $2,000, and that it appears upon the face of the amended complaint herein that the sum demanded in damages is the sum of $5,000. ’ ’ The court below properly overruled the demurrer. It has been uniformly held that the City Court has jurisdiction of an action wherein the complaint demands judgment for a greater sum than $2,000 with interest and costs, although a judgment for a sum in excess of that amount cannot be entered. Ralli v. Pearsall, 69 App. Div. 254. The case of Lewkowicz v. Queen Aeroplane Co., 154 App. Div. 142; 207 N. Y. 290, has in no way changed this rule.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer within six days after service of a copy of the order entered herewith, with notice of entry in the City Court upon payment of costs in this court and the court below.

G-uy and Bijtjb, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.