Levy v. Wilcox

Plaintiff sues upon two causes of action for money had and received. The evidence shows that the plaintiff was the owner of a second mortgage upon property owned by one Underhill. The plaintiff claimed that Underhill made an agreement with him, whereby the defendants were appointed agents to collect the rent of the premises for the month of February, 1912.

Notwithstanding that the defendants conceded that they were liable to the plaintiff upon the first cause of action alleged for $14.67, *1082the court below awarded judgment for the defendants. As to the second cause of action alleged, there was a conflict in the evidence as to whether or not the defendants were to collect the rents for the plaintiff for the month of March, 1912. We think that the evidence, as well as the probabilities of the case, point very strongly to the fact that such an agreement was made. The evidence convincingly established that the defendants collected $348 as rent for the month of March, Í912, and that their disbursements in managing the property amounted only to $107.12.

Under the circumstances disclosed, the judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.