Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Krasne v. New York Rys. Co.

Krasne v. New York Rys. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 7, 1913 · Bijur
140 N.Y.S. 355 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Barnett E. Kopelman, of New York City, for appellant., James L. Quackenbush, of New York City (Henry F. Gannon, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Krasne v. New York Rys. Co.

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.-

It appears by the affidavit of the plaintiff’s attorney that on the day set for trial the case was called at 9 o’clock in the-morning. Plaintiff was present in person with his witnesses. His attorney, however, suffered an “unforeseen delay” and did not reach the courtroom until 10 minutes later.

Under these circumstances, I think the default should have been opened and the judgment of dismissal vacated, as is hereby directed, upon payment by plaintiff to defendant of the costs of the action to date, but with costs of this appeal to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.