Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Charles & Heller v. Grossmayer

Charles & Heller v. Grossmayer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 10, 1913 · Delany
140 N.Y.S. 959 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Samuel D. Matthews, of New York City, for appellants., Adolph B. Rosenfield, of New York City, for respondent.

Charles & Heller v. Grossmayer

Opinion of the Court

DELANY, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from an order setting aside a verdict as contrary to law, contrary to the evidence, and against the weight of evidence.

The action was brought to recover the sum of $150, the value of a suit manufactured by the plaintiffs at the request of the defendant and delivered to her. She returned the suit and refused to pay for it, claiming that it was in many respects inferior in the quality of material, and not made in the style ordered, and not a proper fit. The action was tried by the court with a jury. There is not an exception in the entire case by defendant. The question was purely one of fact, and was submitted to the jury under instructions adequate for the protection of the defendant’s rights. Their finding.should be conclusive.

The order setting aside the verdict is reversed, with costs, and the verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs reinstated, with costs to the plaintiffs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.