Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

De Blasi v. Taddonio

De Blasi v. Taddonio
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 17, 1913 · Bijur
142 N.Y.S. 271 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Nicholas Selvaggi, of New York City, for appellants., Albert H. Vitale, of New York City, for respondent.

De Blasi v. Taddonio

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover $100, loaned to defendants. The defense is usury.

Defendants and their father and mother all testify that the plaintiff demanded and received at the end of each of three years $14 interest. Plaintiff claims, as I read the testimony, never to have either asked or received any interest, but only some $8 for disbursements which he had incurred. The judgment was for $68. If the learned trial judge believed the plaintiff, the judgment should have been for $100 at least; and if the defendants,/ to the effect that there had been usury, then the judgment should have been for the defendants. -

Judgment reversed, on the authority of Goldberg v. Blaine (Sup.) 137 N. Y. Supp. 893, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.