Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Equitable Trust Co. v. Wehrenberg

Equitable Trust Co. v. Wehrenberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 13, 1913 · Guy
143 N.Y.S. 1014 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

McLear & McLear, of New York City, for appellant., Antonio Ferme, of New York City, for respondent.

Equitable Trust Co. v. Wehrenberg

Opinion of the Court

GUY, J.

After several adjournments of the trial of this action, after issue joined, neither party appeared upon the adjourned day, and the action was dismissed. Subsequently the plaintiff moved to vacate the judgment of dismissal and to open its default, which motion was denied. From the order denying such motion, the plaintiff appeals.

The only objection raised against granting the plaintiff relief was that the court below had lost jurisdiction of the case and that plaintiff’s only remedy was to begin a new action. This was error. Johnson v. Monahan, 47 Misc. Rep. 689, 94 N. Y. Supp. 351; Droege v. Herz, 48 Misc. Rep. 346, 95 N. Y. Supp. 570; Goldstein v. Mason-Seamon Trans. Co., 137 N. Y. Supp. 961.

Order reversed, judgment vacated, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.