Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Connors v. Gross

Connors v. Gross
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 13, 1913 · Bijur
144 N.Y.S. 18 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Robert H. Woody, of New York City (Everett F. Warrington, of Brooklyn, of counsel), for appellant., Joseph Gallagher, of New York City, for respondent.

Connors v. Gross

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sued for personal injuries sustained as follows: She was in the employ of defendant as a cleaner, and while working on defendant’s premises, a loft building, slipped on a piece of ice, which was one of several pieces scattered near the entrance to the elevator in defendant’s loft.

[1] The action was brought, and submitted to the court, on the theory that it was covered by the Employers’ Liability Act. The notice, however, was served long after the expiration of the statutory period, and there was no sufficient proof excusing the delay.

[2] Apart from that error, also, I am at a loss to find, in the record, proof of negligence on the part of the defendant. All that appears is that some one left a piece of ice on the floor. Respondent points to no specific duty of the master in this respect which has not been performed.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant „to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.