Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Onward Const. Co. v. Harris

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 4, 1913 · Seabury

144 N.Y.S. 318 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Osborne & Lamb, of New York City (James. W. Osborne and Gilbert D. Lamb, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Hastings & Gleason, of New York City (Edward L. Dennis, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

SEABURY, J.

This is an action to recover rent upon a written lease. The defendant pleaded constructive eviction. The facts are undisputed.

The plaintiff operated an apartment hotel. The defendant was the lessee of an apartment therein. On January 9 and again on January 10, 1910, the treasurer of the plaintiff wrote letters to the defendant which were so grossly insulting and threatening in character as to seriously and substantially deprive the defendant of the beneficial enjoyment of the premises demised, and constituted such a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment as to constructively evict the defendant. The plaintiff’s claim that it cannot be held for the acts of its treasurer cannot be sustained, in view of the authority which it permitted its treasurer to exercise in the apartment hotel.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.